TICC CMB 2017-12-05 minutes

Date: 2017-12-05

Time: 14.00-16.00 CET

Type of meeting: conference call

Participants and absents


Chair

Hans Berg <hans.berg@tickstar.com> as eDelivery CC Leader

Elected members (with voting right)

Kristiansen, Olav Astad <Olav.AstadKristiansen@difi.no>

Oriol Bausà Peris <oriol@invinet.org>

Helger, Philip <philip.helger@brz.gv.at>

Sven Rostgaard Rasmussen <svrra@digst.dk>


Observers (without voting right)

Rapisarda Isabella <isabella.rapisarda@consip.it> as Pre-award CC Leader

Sören Pedersen <Soren.Pedersen@esv.se> as Post Award CC Leader

Previous eDelivery CMB Minutes

2017-05-05

2017-05-19

2017-06-20

2017-10-04

2017-10-19

2017-11-08

2017-11-24

2017-11-28


Agenda


  1. Approval of minutes from last 2 meetings
  2. Follow up on decisions from last 2 meetings
  3. SMP Service Level
  4. Publication of AS4 specs
  5. MLR Policy poll
  6. SBDH specs (https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-14)
  7. PKI status (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q_WyZrjiGLzVGXlAsoCNhhr53-wzmYsK1OSj1nRzPM0/edit#)
  8. BIS 3.0 issue: Endpoint (AP) ID list (https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-9)
  9. Make PEPPOL Directory capability mandatory for all SMP
  10. Agreement Framework issues
    1. References to tech specs: https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/projects/AF/issues/AF-9


  1. SMP SML upgrade to OASIS BDXR 1.0 specs
    1. SMP: https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-16
    2. SML: https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-17


  1. Decide on mandate for AP and SMP Testing Workgroup (https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-18)
  2. Scheduled meetings:
    1. Wed, Dec 20th 15:30-17:00
    2. Fri, Jan 12th 14:00-16:00
    3. Fri, Jan 26th 14:00-16:00

Topics not discussed


  1. Agreement framework issues:
  2. PEPPOL Authority Compliance
    • TICC related:
      • France and Austria using one participant Id for all public entities
      • Belgium’s trading partner onboarding procedure
      • synchronous validation with negative MDNs
    • POACC related:
  3. AOB
  4. Other open JIRA issues (https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/projects/TICC/issues?filter=allopenissues)

Decisions

  1. It was decided that the SLA for SMPs shall be 99.5% aligning with the TICC CMB decision on Nov 24. Philip Helger, BRZ voted against this proposal (because of missing background information).
  2. Difi commented line 282 and line 291
    1. Line 282: Removing the line “The first MIME message part must be the main payload”
      Answer Sander: That was removed because of a comment by CEF that this would go beyond the standards. Which is open to interpretation… because it is about an optional MIME parameter.
    2. Line 291: compression with application/gzip is optional -> according to Difi tech guys this “will increase” the implementation costs.
      Answer PH: the codelist of AS4 compression algorithms consists only of “application/gzip” so it just makes compression for the sender optional but no additional implementation costs are imposed, because no other compressions algorithms are supported by AS4. It’s really just a MANDATORY to OPTIONAL change.
  3. Not using TLS is a problem for Belgium PEPPOL Authority. Belgium needs to elaborate more and send RFC.
  4. It was decided to publish the 1.0 version of the OpenPEPPOL AS4 specs. Next steps are:
    1. We need version 1.0 from Sander incl. Sources (Word + Images)
    2. Publish on GitHub
    3. Publish in TICC area on website
    4. Add note that any changes are to be send to rfc@peppol.eu
    5. Create LinkedIn message, Tweets etc. (optional)
    6. AS4 work group should come up with next steps document (upcoming project milestones)
  5. MLR poll end of vote:
    1. Olav in favour of Dec. 10th, Sven + Oriol + Hans in favour of Dec 6th, Philip abstain ⇒ close tomorrow EOB
    2. Philip to provide TVR document until next TICC CMB
    3. MLR working group to present the necessary options to be decided upon
    4. Next TICC CMB decides on MLR policy
  6. SBDH: doc.id and process.id schemes are not visible now.
    1. The content of the changes proposed by Philip were accepted, but the editing process is not finished, and therefore we cannot publish it yet.
    2. It may be impacted by the decision on the MLR policy (if sender decides)
  7. PKI Status
    1. Technical details are sorted out (same structure as we have, no STS, 2048 Bits, SHA256)
    2. Can the old system issue certificates after January 26th? Answer: we don’t know
  8. PEPPOL Invoice 3.0 Endpoint IDs
    1. Olav send out email with problem explanation
    2. Code List team needs to do something
  9. PEPPOL Directory
    1. Make technical support for PEPPOL Directory mandatory for all SMP implementations as agreed in Warsaw. Unanimously accepted.
    2. By default all PEPPOL participants should be in the PEPPOL Directory except they opt-out (compared to start empty and have them opt-in). Unanimously accepted.
    3. PEPPOL Directory team to propose the way forward (dates, tests, what to do).
  10. Agreement framework
    1. Hans prepares point for next meeting
  11. Capability Specification Upgrades (CSU)
    1. Upgrade to OASIS SMP 1.0 spec together with PEPPOL Directory requirement (OASIS SMP 2.0 is not relevant at the moment)
    2. Upgrade to OASIS BDXL 1.0 spec
    3. Workgroup leader unknown so far
  12. Mandate for test bed
    1. Olav to present updated mandate next CMB


Action items


  1. Hans to inform Sander to make AS4 profile spec 1.0
  2. Hans to inform Ger Clancy on PEPPOL Directory action items
  3. Philip to create mandate for CSU (see Decision #11)
  4. Olav to provide updated mandate for test bed (until Dec 15th, eob)




-- EoD