eDelivery CMB meeting 2024-08-01 minutes
Date: 2024-08-01
Time: 10:00-12:00 CEST
Type of meeting: Teams
Participants and absents
Chair
@GEOK_Seong_Wah@imda.gov.sg as eDelivery Community Leader
Elected members (with voting right)
@Bård Langöy (Pagero) (apologies received)
@Risto Collanus (Visma)
@Iacopo.Arduini@regione.emilia-romagna.it (Emilia Romagna)
@Arun Kumar Sharma (Basware)
Guests (without voting right)
@Philip Helger (OpenPeppol OO)
@Klaus Vilstrup (OpenPeppol OO)
Hayden Tay (IMDA) (apologies received)
Agenda
Open Tasks
New Tickets
Any other business
Approval of Minutes
eDelivery CMB meeting 2024-07-18
Status: approved
Information/Discussion items
Organisational topics
eDEC Webinar to present recent updates in eDEC
Proposed date and time:
End of September/beginning of October
Possible contents:
Focus on information (90%), less interaction (10%)
CIWG status
SMP 2.0 status
eDEC perspective on PINT
Changes in 2024 so far
Detailed plans for the near/medium future
MLS status
GENA incubation
Peppol France?
...
Detailed Planning on beginning of August
News
News from the Peppol Network
Peppol - GENA consolidation
CIWG
Service Provider Identification Scheme (identify C2 and C3)
SMP 2.0 WG
MLA work group (for MLS)
OO Internal Peppol Directory Initiative
Open Tasks @Philip Helger
Code List alignment
eDEC Specifications
Add that new specifications take effect at 00:00 UTC unless noted otherwise
Activities for this year
Initial draft for Activities 2024 was ciruclated internally
Published
Progress alignment with change and release management based on new agreement change processes
Continue Peppol specification upgrade based on latest version of underlying standard e.g., OASIS
Commence work on future of SML – defining business requirements followed by solution implementation in due course
Documentation of Peppol eDelivery Network Architecture
Ensure and maintain safe & secure operation over Peppol eDelivery Network
Resource problem is still pressing
Ad activity 2: Discussion on the comparison of new and existing standards should be done in a less "ad hoc way"
Start documenting findings in a more structured way
Ad activity 3: Brainstorming for Peppol Architecure v2 has been started
Check if a restricted Confluence page can be used instead
Crosscheck with the long term tasks
Next meeting(s)
Next meeting: Thursday August 15st, 10:00 to 12:00 CEST
SPC relevant
Code List Update v8.9
Changes to Peppol Policy for use of Identifiers 4.3.0
Eventually: SP Identification Scheme
New tasks and Issues (from last meeting)
Issues: https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/issues/?filter=10258
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/issues/TICC-349
Information: Changes to the peppol-doctype-wildcard scheme to support exact matches
Update: proposed changes to the specification were approved and will be send out to public review asap
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/issues/TICC-348
Information: Request to add ICD code 0236 to eDEC Participant Identifier Scheme code list
Updated: none
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-347
Information: support for larger documents in the Peppol Network
Update: none
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-344
Information: RFC to align receiver identification in SBDH and Payload; similar to TICC-330
TICC-335 to TICC-341 are related to the new Enhanced B2B domain
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-333
Information: Addition of Italy specific Invoice identifiers
Update: none
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-332
Information: RFC to convert the output of the MLA work group (the Message Level Status, MLS) into an eDEC specification
Update: none
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-330
Information: Mandatory use of same identifier in recipient field of SBDH and endpointID in document; relates to TICC-344
Update: none
Responsible:
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-327
Information: Error correction for Reporting Specification needed
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-325
Information: Create official clarification between the use of a Participant Identifier and a Legal Identifier
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-323
Information: Change Lower boundary of Business Entity within Business Card
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-322
Information: Ambiguity of Participant Identifier Casing between POLICY 1 and POLICY 2
Update: This will be part of the Peppol Policy for use of Identifier 4.3.0
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-315
Information: Peppol Reporting name change
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-313
Information: added Participant Identifier Scheme 0234 to the eDEC CodeList
Decision: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-311
Information: Use UTC for all Peppol publications date time
Update: none
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-310
Information: Codelist alignment
Update: none
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-309
Information: Codelist alignment
Update: none
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-308
Information: internal activity: create AP Operational Guideline
Update: none
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-303
Information: extract Business Card specification from Peppol Directory specification
Update: none
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-285
Proposal to make mandatoriness of Directory API in SMP specification more clear
Update: none
Decision: OO to clarify on the mandatory use of Business Cards.
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-284
Information: AS4 inconclusive specification on signing of AS4 Error messages
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-282
Update: Deprecate old Business Card Formats
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-269
Information: Request to improve consistency in AS4 error handling
Update: none
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-263
Information: Peppol Participant (Corner 4) served by more than one Access Point
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-235
Information: Start definining potential actions for removing identifiers in the Code List States Document. Start with TICC-228
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-233
Information; Its about a wording issue in the Peppol Envelope Policy (SBDH)
Update: none
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-226
Information: New SMP API proposal (migration code exchange)
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-225
Information: New SMP API proposal (health check)
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-224
Information: New SMP API proposal (identify)
Update: none
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-223
Information: Collection issue: Peppol, EESPA, BPC
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-218
Information: Clarify case sensitivity of Peppol Seat ID
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-206
Information: Number of retries on an AS4 level
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-202
Information: Information about caching of SMP results for usage in a Peppol AP is missing
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-187
Information: Allow 0080 as new Participant Identifier scheme
Update: none
Responsible:
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-174
Information: The term "Subject Unique Identifier" in the Peppol SMP specification 1.1.0 requires clarification, as this certificate field is not present in the Peppol certificates.
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-168
Information: Have a separate participant identifier prefix for testing purposes.
Update: none
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-167
Information: regarding joint information on news and noteworthy
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-166
Information: Clarification on the words "custom validation" in the AS4 profile was sought.
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-153
Information: https for SMP
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-151
Information: (Whitepaper) Enforce people to use SMK for testing?
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-149
Information: add a Schematron for verifying the AS4 headers. Updates directly in the issue.
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-146
Information: (Whitepaper) Creation of the Whitepaper.
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-142
Information: (Whitepaper)
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-140
Information: (Whitepaper)
Responsible: @Philip Helger
Attachments
none