eDelivery CMB meeting 2023-12-21 minutes
Date: 2023-12-21
Time: 08:30-10:30 CET
Type of meeting: MS Teams
Participants and absents
Chair
@Elly Stinchcombe (Unlicensed) as eDelivery Community Leader
Elected members (with voting right)
@Bård Langöy (Pagero)
@Risto Collanus (Visma)
@Iacopo.Arduini@regione.emilia-romagna.it (Emilia Romagna)
@Arun Kumar Sharma (Basware)
Guests (without voting right)
@Philip Helger (OpenPeppol OO)
@Klaus Vilstrup (OpenPeppol OO) (apologies received)
@Lefteris Leontaridis (OpenPeppol OO) (8:30 to 9:30)
@Erwin Wulterkens (OpenPeppol OO) (8:30 to 9:30)
@Paul Simons (PoAC) (8:30 to 9:30)
@Ahti Allikas (SPC) (8:30 to 9:30)
Agenda
News from the Peppol Network
Open Tasks
New Tickets
Other
Approval of Minutes
eDelivery CMB meeting 2023-11-23
Status: approved
Information/Discussion items
Organisational topics
Discussion on SBDH update/reporting
Long discussion around the different options, etc.
Key output: we cannot enforce SP to disrupt traffic
Actions: OO to draft an email for SP to clarify the process and send it out to (Erwin)
Room for improvement: guidance level; OO to provide documents and tools in time; improve testability
Idea on eDEC CMB members: one PA member would be considered positive
News
News from the Peppol network
MC++ meeting in last week of November
Was not discussed in the meeting
Retabled a paper from January 2022 - issues about resources, scalability etc. are still present
Potential F2F meeting in last week of May in Brussels???
Elly's term ends in April 2024
Peppol - EESPA consolidation
MLA work group (for MLS)
No update
Reporting
Service Provider Identification Scheme
No update
SMP 2.0.0
No update
Nemhandel network in Denmark
To be handled by OO on the governance level
Open Tasks @Philip Helger
Finalize TICC-19
Add hint on upcoming SMP 2.0 specification
Activities for this year
Published
Progress alignment with change and release management based on new agreement change processes
Continue Peppol specification upgrade based on latest version of underlying standard e.g., OASIS
Commence work on future of SML – defining business requirements followed by solution implementation in due course
Documentation of Peppol eDelivery Network Architecture
Ensure and maintain safe & secure operation over Peppol eDelivery Network
Resource problem is still pressing
Ad activity 2: Discussion on the comparison of new and existing standards should be done in a less "ad hoc way"
Start documenting findings in a more structured way
Ad activity 3: Brainstorming for Peppol Architecure v2 has been started
Check if a restricted Confluence page can be used instead
Crosscheck with the long term tasks
Next meeting
Thursday January 18th, 8:30 to 10:30 CET
SPC relevant
Reporting update (Schematron focus)
New tasks and Issues (from last meeting)
Issues: https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/issues/?filter=10258
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-306
Information: request to add Participant Identifier Scheme 0232 (NOBB number) but for "StandardItemIdentification" but not for parties.
Decision: rejected, not an eDEC topic
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-305
Information: error corrections and improvements to the SBDH specification
Decision: agreed
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-304
Information: deprecate and remove old DE specific document type
Decision: agreed
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-303
Information: extract Business Card specification from Peppol Directory specification
Decision: agreed
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-286
Suggestion on C4 Country Code
Decision: Wait for full CMB group participation
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-285
Proposal to make mandatoriness of Directory API in SMP specification more clear
Update: none
Decision: OO to clarify on the mandatory use of Businees Cards.
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-284
Information: AS4 inconclusive specification on signing of AS4 Error messages
Update: none
Responsible: @Elly Stinchcombe (Unlicensed)
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-282
Update: Impact Analysis was provided
Decision: Deprecate and Remove old Business Card Formats version 1 and version 2. Whether the result is Directory 1.1.2, 1.2.0 or 2.0.0 depends on the agility of the 3 affected SMP operators. PH to reach out to them.
Responsible: PH
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-269
Information: Request to improve consistency in AS4 error handling
Update: none
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-263
Information: Peppol Participant (Corner 4) served by more than one Access Point
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-259
Information: Request to add Participant Identifier scheme 0218
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-246
Information: update the SMP digest algorithms from SHA-1 to SHA-256
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-235
Information: Start definining potential actions for removing identifiers in the Code List States Document. Start with TICC-228
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-233
Information; Its about a wording issue in the Peppol Envelope Policy (SBDH)
Update: none
Responsible: @Elly Stinchcombe (Unlicensed)
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-226
Information: New SMP API proposal (migration code exchange)
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-225
Information: New SMP API proposal (health check)
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-224
Information: New SMP API proposal (identify)
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-223
Information: Collection issue: Peppol, EESPA, BPC
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-218
Information: Clarify case sensitivity of Peppol Seat ID
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-206
Information: Number of retries on an AS4 level
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-202
Information: Information about caching of SMP results for usage in a Peppol AP is missing
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-201
Information: Review of new/updated OASIS specifications
Update: none
Responsible: @Elly Stinchcombe (Unlicensed)
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-187
Information: Allow 0080 as new Participant Identifier scheme
Update: none
Responsible: @Elly Stinchcombe (Unlicensed)
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-184
Information: Align Participant Identifier Scheme Code lists of PoAC and eDEC
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-174
Information: The term "Subject Unique Identifier" in the Peppol SMP specification 1.1.0 requires clarification, as this certificate field is not present in the Peppol certificates.
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-168
Information: Have a separate participant identifier prefix for testing purposes.
Update: none
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-167
Information: regarding joint information on news and noteworthy
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-166
Information: Clarification on the words "custom validation" in the AS4 profile was sought.
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-153
Information: https for SMP
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-151
Information: (Whitepaper) Enforce people to use SMK for testing?
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-149
Information: add a Schematron for verifying the AS4 headers. Updates directly in the issue.
Update: none
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-146
Information: (Whitepaper) Creation of the Whitepaper.
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-142
Information: (Whitepaper)
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-140
Information: (Whitepaper)
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-19
Information: Information on how to determine and handle inactive SMP providers
Update: work in progress
Responsible: @Philip Helger
Attachments
none