eDelivery CMB meeting 2023-05-25 minutes
Date: 2023-05-25
Time: 09:00-11:00 CET
Type of meeting: MS Teams
Participants and absents
Chair
Elly Stinchcombe (Unlicensed) as eDelivery Community Leader
Elected members (with voting right)
Bård Langöy (Pagero)
Risto Collanus (Visma)
Iacopo.Arduini@regione.emilia-romagna.it (Emilia Romagna)
Arun Kumar (Basware)
Guests (without voting right)
Philip Helger (OpenPeppol OO) (apologies received)
Klaus Vilstrup (OpenPeppol OO)
Agenda
- Progress alignment with change and release management based on new agreement change processes
- Continue Peppol specification upgrade based on latest version of underlying standard e.g., OASIS
- Commence work on future of SML – defining business requirements followed by solution implementation in due course
- Documentation of Peppol eDelivery Network Architecture
- Ensure and maintain safe & secure operation over Peppol eDelivery Network
- Other
Approval of Minutes
eDelivery CMB meeting 2023-05-11 minutes
Status: moved to next meeting
Information/Discussion items
- Next meeting Monday (2023-06-06, 9:00 to 11:00 CET
- Moved due to overlap with the OpenPeppol GA
Issues
- Progress alignment with change and release management based on new agreement change processes
- Status and questions around specifications and codelists.
- Mostly we believe we are following these processes.
- Need to ensure POAC use the same definition of major v minor changes.
- Need to ensure good coordination between POAC and eDEC i.e.alignment of codes list release times and alignment of codes.
- Do we have a discussion group to coordinate? OO to assist (Klaus Vilstrup).
- Continue Peppol specification upgrade based on latest version of underlying standard e.g., OASIS
- Internal WG is in place and work is progressing well with clearly defined scope and outcomes
- High level timeline to be developed with some key milestones (while keeping group informal)
- Invite to be extended to Klaus Vilstrup, Klaus talks to Philip Helger about this group.
- Commence work on future of SML – defining business requirements followed by solution implementation in due course
- Need to dig out previous commentary from eDec discussions on this topic (on Google Drive – (Bård Langöy)
- BPC have done a POC on a federated/distributed SML – We need details and the results (Philip Helger was a part of the WG).
- Need to ensure we properly understand expectation of MC
- Need to define business requirements and understand various options and their pros/cons
- Kick this work off once SMP work is done, Klaus Vilstrup to take the lead
- Documentation of Peppol eDelivery Network Architecture
- Low priority
- Recommend to be done post SMP and SML work
- Revisit when ready
- Ensure and maintain safe & secure operation over Peppol eDelivery Network
- Our BAU work, we need to look at open tickets on this and see what needs to be done
- Are we hooked into Security WG? Arun participates irregularly
- Interconnected with number 2: Need for an architecture overview of existing and future technologies.
- Other
- Consider SBDH and XHE? Should this go in SMP WG or run it separately?
- What is future state of Peppol Directory e.g. do we make Peppol Directory mandatory and switch from an opt-in to an opt-out process, and is this an eDec responsibility to progress?
- Technology review (Klaus Vilstrup)
- Resourcing view (Klaus Vilstrup)
- Philip Helger - a reminder of the action from last CMB to speak to Didier and ask if he can present the French PoC to the eDEC CMB for 10 to 15 minutes
SPC relevant
- Nothing atm
New tasks and Issues (from last meeting)
Issues: https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/issues/?filter=10258
-
-
TICC-259Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: Request to add Participant Identifier scheme 0218
- Decision: none
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-256Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: Remove participant identifier scheme 9956
- Update: none
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-246Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: update the SMP digest algorithms from SHA-1 to SHA-256
- Update: none
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-235Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: Start definining potential actions for removing identifiers in the Code List States Document. Start with TICC-228
- Update: none
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-234Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: RFC about Ppfuoi changes for PINT - making DDTS officially supported
- Update: Approved in last CMB
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-233Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information; Its about a wording issue in the Peppol Envelope Policy (SBDH)
- Update: none
- Responsible: Elly Stinchcombe (Unlicensed)
-
-
TICC-226Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: New SMP API proposal (migration code exchange)
-
-
TICC-225Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: New SMP API proposal (health check)
-
-
TICC-224Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: New SMP API proposal (identify)
-
-
TICC-223Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: Collection issue: Peppol, EESPA, BPC
-
-
TICC-218Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: Clarify case sensitivity of Peppol Seat ID
- Update: none
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-206Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: Number of retries on an AS4 level
- Update: none
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-203Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: Please add SHA256 XMLsig to Peppol-SMP specs because Java17-security change
- Update: none
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-202Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: Information about caching of SMP results for usage in a Peppol AP is missing
- Update: none
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-201Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: Review of new/updated OASIS specifications
- Update: none
- Responsible: Elly Stinchcombe (Unlicensed)
-
-
TICC-187Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: Allow 0080 as new Participant Identifier scheme
- Update: none
- Responsible: Elly Stinchcombe (Unlicensed)
-
-
TICC-184Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: Align Participant Identifier Scheme Code lists of PoAC and eDEC
- Update: none
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-174Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: The term "Subject Unique Identifier" in the Peppol SMP specification 1.1.0 requires clarification, as this certificate field is not present in the Peppol certificates.
- Update: none
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-168Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: Have a separate participant identifier prefix for testing purposes.
- Update: none
-
-
TICC-167Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: regarding joint information on news and noteworthy
- Update: none
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-166Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: Clarification on the words "custom validation" in the AS4 profile was sought.
- Update: none
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-153Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: https for SMP
- Update: none
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-151Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: (Whitepaper) Enforce people to use SMK for testing?
- Update: none
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-149Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: add a Schematron for verifying the AS4 headers. Updates directly in the issue.
- Update: none
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-146Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: (Whitepaper) Creation of the Whitepaper.
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-142Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: (Whitepaper)
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-140Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: (Whitepaper)
- Responsible: Philip Helger
-
-
TICC-19Getting issue details...
STATUS
- Information: Information on how to determine and handle inactive SMP providers
- Update: none
- Responsible: Philip Helger
Attachments
none