eDelivery CMB meeting 2019-11-06 minutes
Date: 2019-10-23
Time: 14:00-15:30 CEST
Type of meeting: Gotomeeting (https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/811447525)
Participants and absents
Chair
@Klaus Vilstrup Pedersen (Unlicensed) as eDelivery Community Leader
Elected members (with voting right)
@Risto Collanus (Visma)
@Bård Langöy (Pagero)
@Hans Berg (Deactivated) (Tickstar)
Guests (without voting right)
Philip Helger (OpenPEPPOL OO)
Agenda
Approval of minutes
New tasks and Issues
Actions
Information items
AoB
Approval of Minutes
eDelivery CMB meeting 2019-10-23 minutes
Approved
New tasks and Issues
Issues: https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/issues/?filter=10226
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-103
Decision: Documented in the issue itself
Action: Make editorial changes
Responsible: @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-102
Decision: Handled and closed
Action: Added to clode list v6
Responsible: @Philip Helger
Other:
#
Actions
Action log: eDelivery CMB action log
Actions handled in this meeting:
Policy for identifiers revision publishing
Decision: Publish
Action: Discuss revision vs. minor release; it was decided to use version number 4.1.0 (minor release, update from 4.0.1). Need to check release management. Relationship to ICD 0203 (https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-99).
Responsible: @Klaus Vilstrup Pedersen (Unlicensed), @Philip Helger
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-95 -
Decision: accepted the CR
Action:
Merge process identifier code list into the document type code list, assigning each document type identifier exactly the one process identifier in which it can be used
The assumption is, that document type and process identifiers are always used in combination
It was agreed that there is a 1:n relationship from Document type IDs to Process IDs (for legacy identifiers)
New document type identifiers should only have a 1:1 relationship
Responsible: @Philip Helger to change the code lists
https://openpeppol.atlassian.net/browse/TICC-19: Remove off boarded SMPs from SML (along with the participants registered) - assign to OO? @Klaus Vilstrup Pedersen (Unlicensed) talk to @Philip Helger. Jesper has list.
Define rules, when an SMP is considered dead.
Action: setup a telco to discuss the rules for marking an SMP "offline" as well as suggestions for consequences
Responsible: @Philip Helger, @Hans Berg (Deactivated), @Bård Langöy - @Risto Collanus and @Klaus Vilstrup Pedersen (Unlicensed) trust these guys
Migration policy for AS2 v2 spec., visit TICC CMB 2019-02-12 minutes for input on this topic.
It was agreed not to do before the AS4 migration
Allow Peppol AS2 v2 optionally by February,1st 2020 (T1, phase-in)
Make Peppol AS2 v2 mandatory by April 1st, 2020 (T2, transition)
Disallow Peppol AS2 v1 in the network by June 1st, 2020 (T3, phase-out)
Check migration names @Klaus Vilstrup Pedersen (Unlicensed)
Action for @Philip Helger provide a migration support document for Peppol AS2 providers
CMB decided on the above
Provide a list of validation rules for the participant identifiier schemes (@Bård Langöy and @Philip Helger)
Actions not handled in this meeting:
#
Information/Discussion items
Asset list and processes - maintained by OO
Personal identity number as Company identity
GDPR?
Capacity of SML?
Work Groups
Netmeetings and F2F
WG leaders needed
Reporting PEPPOL Reporting Work Group - @Philip Helger
Postponed
5-Corner/Clearance model
Dynamic lookup from POAC "International Invoice"
Next meeting on Tuesday November 19th, 2pm to 4pm
Attachments