eB2B Launch Meeting (LM-6, 19.02.2025)
Participants, observers and interested parties
AtTendedSovos (Johan Borendal, Luiz Santos) Signed-upeB2B CertImpl
AtTended Traffiqx/b4value (Moritz Plößl)OpusCapita (Ahti Allikas)
AtTended TietoEvry (Tuija Lompolojärvi)UnifiedPost (Alex Hincu)
AtTended Logiq (Andreas Bye) Observe
AtTended Visma (Risto Collanus) Signed-up
AtTended VAT IT (Julian Lap) Observe
EXCUSED Billit (Dirk Willekens) Signed-upeB2B CertImpl
MySupply (Jesper Larsen) Signed-upeB2B CertImpl
Storecove (Michael Riviera) Signed-upeB2B CertImpl
Global Digital Post (Harald Jasser) Signed-upeB2B CertImpl
Pagero (Sebastian Boklund)
Axway (Michel Gilis)
Seeburger (Katharina Koch)
IBM (Ger Clancy)
B2BRouter (Henrik Möller) Observe
B2Boost (Jan Eekhout)
Comarch (Rafal Trojanowski)
Meeting Notes
Sign-Up and Participation Status: no formal changes since LM-5
Open to involving AP Software Providers to Launch Meeting series
VeR (German chapter of GENA) considering to setup an EB2B working group with potentially 4-5 members to start with
Implementation Status and Planning (Building an eB2B endpoint)
Testbed status update:
Suite to verify connectivity of APs using eB2B certificate - operational as confirmed by Billit, GDP
EB2B Issuer certificate to be added to Introduction to the revised PKI Certificate infrastructure and issuing process
SPIS - Service Provider Identification Scheme: additional addressing options
Scheduled to go out for public review end of the week (part of PoAC MLS specification process)
Document Types
EB2B Document Types added to upcoming eDEC Codelist V9.1
Syncing (generic) MLS document type to expected MLS specification (up for eDEC CMB approval on 20.2.25)
Participants' Status
Sovos (Luis): Starting implementation in February (Testbed connectivity)
GDP (Harald - via Email): completed connectivity testing
See more status in LM-5
Question: What’s the impact of “EB2B certificate” requirement on implementation adoption?
Generally, requires setup of a dedicated AP instance for EB2B, similar to e.g. DBNA
From development teams' point of view: not a major driver of effort