Peppol France PoC FAQ - updated 17 May
What is SMP? | Peppol is a set of artifacts and specifications enabling cross-border eProcurement among the various European countries. The aim of Peppol is to standardize the electronic communication between different entities such as suppliers, buyers, and governments. OpenPeppol is the organisation and Peppol is the Network. SMP, standing for Service Metadata Publisher, is an important component within the Peppol network. It's a server that hosts service metadata for a participant in the Peppol network. The SMP provides necessary details such as participant identifiers, document identifiers, process identifiers, and the endpoint address (URL) of the participant's Access Point (AP) where the documents should be sent. In other words, the SMP acts like a directory, assisting in the process of routing documents to the correct destination in the Peppol network. The sender can query the SMP to find out where to send a particular type of document for a specific recipient. This setup allows for the interoperability between different companies, systems, and countries that the Peppol network is designed to achieve. |
What is SML? | SML in the context of the Peppol network stands for Service Metadata Locator. The SML is essentially a DNS (Domain Name System) service that plays a crucial role in the routing of documents within the Peppol network. It helps locate the correct Service Metadata Publisher (SMP) for a specific participant in the Peppol network. Here's how it works:
|
What is the purpose of the Peppol France Proof of Concept (PoC)? | Peppol France PoC aims to demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of implementing the Peppol framework within the French public procurement ecosystem. It tests the compatibility of the Peppol standards with the existing French e-procurement systems and evaluates potential improvements in efficiency, cost savings, and cross-border trade opportunities. The initial scope for this Proof of Concept is to cover the relationships between French Tax Payers (C1 and C4) exchanging regulated flows where both the sender platform (C2) and the receiver platform (C3) are registered in Peppol and have become a PDP. As there is no available testing PPF Annuaire nor the PPF, the scope of the PoC will exclude the exchanges with these two systems of the French defined architecture, but will simulate the response of the PPF Annuaire. |
Who is involved in the Peppol France PoC? | This is a joint OpenPeppol/EESPA Project with the involvement of the FNFE. Any SP/member of each of these organisations can join. The results of which will be shared with DGFIP/AIFE. |
How do I participate in the Peppol France PoC? | Participating Service Providers are required to join OpenPeppol and apply for post award membership before they can join the France PoC. If the SP is not already a member, they may send an email to membership@peppol.eu indicating that they are joining for the France PoC exclusively in order to receive a reduced fee. General membership information can be found here: |
Can the Peppol France PoC encounter challenges, and if so, how are they addressed? | Peppol France PoC may encounter challenges such as technical issues, compatibility problems, or stakeholder resistance. To address these challenges:
|
What support is available for organizations during and after the Peppol France PoC? |
|
What SML/SMP to use? |
|
How do I know I’m talking to a PDP? | How then to differentiate PDP and ‘regular’ Peppol flows
|
Who manages the administration of SML/SMP entries? | The Peppol project team does this
What entries will be created by the Peppol team?
|
Can I use my standard Peppol test certificate in the PoC? | No, you can’t
Where do I need to validate if a correct certificate is being used
What happens when a wrong certificate is being used/accepted
|
Why do we use a SBDH in addition to UBL attached document? | The SBDH in many AS4/Peppol solutions is not exposed to the end user/consumer of the services
The UBL attached document allows for
A parallel team is investigating support of native UBL/CII transport
|