/
PoAC CMB minutes 2025-05-30

PoAC CMB minutes 2025-05-30

May 30, 2025

Date: 2025-05-30

Time: 09:00-10:30 CEST

Type of meeting: Gotomeeting (https://www.gotomeet.me/Paul_Simons)

Participants

(P) = Present, (E) Excused

 

Chair

@Paul Simons as POAC Community Leader (P)

Elected members (with voting right)

@Ahti Allikas (P)

@Arne Johan Larsen (P)

@Hannu Kivinen (P)

Jussi Koljonen (p)

@Simon Foster (P)

@Wim Kok (P)

 

OO participants

@Erwin Wulterkens (P)

@Hans Petersen (E)

 

Guests

@GEOK_Seong_Wah@imda.gov.sg (E)

@Philip Helger (E)

 

Agenda

  1. Approval of the meeting minutes

  2. OO Time

  3. May 2025 release status

  4. Publication and Release date Self-Billing PINT

  5. Country specific rules

  6. Grouping of Reviews usefull and wishfull

  7. Grouping of releases

  8. Time necessary for PoAC CMB approvals

  9. Approval of Peppol PoAC May 2025 Release

  10. AOB

  11. Date next meeting

  12. Plan 2025

Topics not discussed

Information items

Decisions

  • The meeting minutes of the previous meeting have been approved.

  • Discussion on the development and approval process.

    • Thoughts from Erwin.

      • More than 2 days approval time is not foreseen in the planning and caused delays.

      • The CMB members do a full QA because there is no trust in the quality

      • Many things are discovered during the CMB members approval process.

    • Thoughts by the CMB members.

      • The overall lack of quality drives us to do a deep QA.

      • There is no trust in the quality of the deliverables.

      • Documentation is not up to the expected level making it hard to find changes.

    • Steps already taken by OO

      • New dedicated resources are involved.

      • Release notes will be clearer.

      • Better QA.

      • This shall lead to overall quality improvement.

      • The PDK is part of the problem. The tool has not enough functionalities to support the development.

      • The PDK will be redesigned to overcome these issues.

    • The CMB members acknowledge that the actions proposed by Erwin will take time.

    • In the meantime they ask a week approval time.

    • Erwin will keep us informed of the progress and if the time can be shortened over time.

    • This can only be done if the CMB members have more confidence in the quality and don't feel the need to do a deep dive.

    • It can be useful to have a log of 'known issues' to inform everyone what will be fixed and when.

    • OO checks the Specialisations and if an issue arises, they will inform the PoAC CMB and ask for approval/disapproval of the publication.

  • AOB

    • Simon suggested to avoid 

Next meetings

  • 2025-06-26 09.00 - 10.30

Attachments