The meeting minutes of the previous meeting have been approved.
Discussion on the development and approval process.
- Thoughts from Erwin.
  - More than 2 days approval time is not foreseen in the planning and caused delays.
  - The CMB members do a full QA because there is no trust in the quality
  - Many things are discovered during the CMB members approval process.
- Thoughts by the CMB members.
  - The overall lack of quality drives us to do a deep QA.
  - There is no trust in the quality of the deliverables.
  - Documentation is not up to the expected level making it hard to find changes.
- Steps already taken by OO
  - New dedicated resources are involved.
  - Release notes will be clearer.
  - Better QA.
  - This shall lead to overall quality improvement.
  - The PDK is part of the problem. The tool has not enough functionalities to support the development.
  - The PDK will be redesigned to overcome these issues.
- The CMB members acknowledge that the actions proposed by Erwin will take time.
- In the meantime they ask a week approval time.
- Erwin will keep us informed of the progress and if the time can be shortened over time.
- This can only be done if the CMB members have more confidence in the quality and don't feel the need to do a deep dive.
- It can be useful to have a log of 'known issues' to inform everyone what will be fixed and when.
- OO checks the Specialisations and if an issue arises, they will inform the PoAC CMB and ask for approval/disapproval of the publication.
AOB
- Simon suggested to avoid

Next meetings

2025-06-26 09.00 - 10.30

PoAC CMB minutes 2025-05-30

Participants

Agenda

Topics not discussed

Information items

Decisions

Attachments