This document covers the proceedings of the work group meeting.
Next online meeting: Wednesday, September 12, 14:00 to 16:00 CEST
P=present, E=excused
Participant | Present | |
---|---|---|
Georg Birgisson | Midran Ltd | P |
Serge Libert | Bosa | |
Dirk Willekens | Bosa | P |
Erlend Klakegg | DIFI | |
Jan Mæroe | DIFI | P |
Martin Forsberg | Ecru | |
Sara Facchinetti | InfoCert | |
Iacopo Arduini | Intercent-ER | E |
Elisa Bertocchi | Intercent-ER | P |
Siw Meckelborg | DIFI / EdiSys | P |
Helena Ask | Visma | |
Peter Danko | E-delivery | |
Andriana Prentza | Unipi | |
Jerry Dimitriou | Unipi | |
Charlotte Skovhus | MySupply | P |
Ole Ellerbæk Madsen | ERST | |
Arne Johan Larsen | Equinor(Statoil) | |
Thomas Petterson | SFTI | P |
Sören Lennartson | SFTI | |
Jalini Srisgantharajah | DIFI | P |
Agenda
DECISIONS TAKEN IN THIS MEETING. Please see minutes for Decisions. Log of all decisions
Following tasks were raised in this meeting. For overview of tasks go to Task report - All
Agenda approved and attendance noted in attendance table.
The schedule of the project has been modified so that it aligns with the schedule of the 2018 Fall release. The two projects will continue as separate projects but we will seek to align the work. Key dates are the following:
2018-09-24 — Initiate Peppol Review.
2018-10-22 — Review period ends.
2018-11-12 — Comment resolution and testing completed.
2018-11-15 — Publishing.
The schematrons will be developed by using a generation tool provided by DIFI. The tool has been setup for the Order transaction.
Schematrons for transactions will be restructured so that the following schematron sets are used for validating each transaction. Each set has its own id sequence.
Although the sets are managed as separate sets they may be distributed as a single file.
The development of schematrons for each transaction requires the following steps
The above needs to carried out for each transaction. Only steps one and two have been carried out for Order.
This work has not yet been resourced. Peppol authorities can contribute either by providing a resource or by funding resource. Following was noted by participants for:
Peppol BIS2 specification allow different unit of measure for orderable quantity and price. This supports ordering and catalogues where the orderable unit is e.g. pieces but the measurement of each piece (weight, volume etc.) varies and the item is priced by that measure. An example is that food items are often ordered in pieces but priced by weight. The EN invoice does not allow these units to be different and that is adopted in the BIS3 Billing.
It was agreed that the use case for different UoM is valid in Order, Order Agreement and Catalogue so Peppol will continue to allow those to be different. A note will be added into relevant sections that when ordering parties should be aware that the invoice will use the price UoM for both price and quantity.
Since the meeting was flowing well it was agreed to continue into alignment of codes even though that was not on the initial agenda.
Meeting closed at 16:00 CEST.