Date: 2018-03-19
Time: 11:00-12:00 CET
Type of meeting: conference call
Chair
Hans Berg <hans.berg@tickstar.com> as eDelivery CC Leader
Elected members (with voting right)
Kristiansen, Olav Astad <Olav.AstadKristiansen@difi.no>
Oriol Bausà Peris <oriol@invinet.org>
Helger, Philip <philip.helger@brz.gv.at>
Sven Rostgaard Rasmussen <svrra@digst.dk>
Observers (without voting right)
Rapisarda Isabella <isabella.rapisarda@consip.it> as Pre-award CC Leader
Sören Pedersen <Soren.Pedersen@esv.se> as Post Award CC Leader
Previous meeting minutes |
---|
2017-05-05 |
2017-05-19 |
2017-06-20 |
2017-10-04 |
2017-10-19 |
2017-11-08 |
2017-11-24 |
2017-11-28 |
2017-12-05 |
2017-12-20 |
2018-01-12 |
2018-01-26 |
2018-02-20 |
2018-03-02 |
2018-03-12 |
As a response to the issues raised below from DIFI I have the below comments:
1) Introducing end-to-end message-encryptions makes it impossible for sending AP’s C2 to ensure message quality.
2) Even if it would be possible to “fix” message quality there still remains the requirement for Senders to request a response confirming receipt of the message – as an additional message following the protocol acknowledgement
3) Danish Government are required to send confirmation on receipt of Invoices and need a mechanism for senders to request this receipt (MLR)
4) The implementation of TVR is a compromise that should reduce the overhead on participants that want to leave the responsibilities to their AP provider – in this context the TVR/MLR is a technical implementation and should not be considered as a strategic issue.
This interference in a consensus process is another example of unjustified interference from DIFI not respecting the overall requirements in PEPPOL, but focusing on Norwegian positions.
-- EoD