Participants and absents

Chair

Hans Berg hans.berg@tickstar.com

Elected members

~~Kristiansen, Olav Astad <Olav.AstadKristiansen@difi.no>~~

Oriol Bausà Peris <oriol@invinet.org>

Philip Helger <philip.helger@brz.gv.at>

Sven Rostgaard Rasmussen <svrra@digst.dk>

Observers

~~Rapisarda Isabella <isabella.rapisarda@consip.it> PreAward CC Leader~~

~~Sören Pedersen <Soren.Pedersen@esv.se> PostAward CC Leader~~

Martin Forsberg <martin.forsberg@ecru.se> (stand-in for Sören)

Previous eDelivery CMB Minutes

None

Agenda

Previous TICC CMB Minutes
Open JIRA issues

Phase out BIS v1 - (https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/tracker/projects/PEPPOL/issues/PEPPOL-4)

Suggestion to phase out by December 1st 2017

Use of incorrect party identifiers in the SMP of IntercentER - (https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/tracker/projects/PEPPOL/issues/PEPPOL-45)
PKI (contract transfer from DIGST to OpenPEPPOL) - (https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/tracker/projects/PEPPOL/issues/PEPPOL-54)
BE:BCE scheme availability - (https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/tracker/browse/PEPPOL-26)

Identifiers being used for receivers (scheme agency code) and document identifiers:

Collect Document Identifiers from PEPPOL Authorities

Mandate for updating the “PEPPOL Policy for identifiers” accordingly

Mandate for an approval process for identifiers

Suggestion: request for new document id’s need to be sent by PA’s to TICC CMB (maybe create template for doc id request?)

Schedule next meeting(s)
AOB

Action items

BISv1

Check with PoACC what decision was made in regards to BIS v1 phase out. Also request which specific document types that will be removed from the network.

Propose to the MC that BIS v1 (a k a generation 1) should be removed from the network by Dec 1st 2017.

PKI

There is a solution for the duration of May 2017. Thomas Gundel is now under supervision of OpenPEPPOL. Make sure to establish a process for PEPPOL Authorities to request new certificates (involve Renate, Anna-Lis and Mairi).

Outstanding PKI related issues:

Change Symantec service platform?
Change Root Certificates?

Hans to check with Renate that the process is ongoing and moved upon.

Code lists (to be published on peppol.eu)

Philip to prepare a request sent to TICC CMB to be decided upon.

Code lists Lists

Issuing agency (iso 6523, NESUBL)
Document (type) identifiers
Process identifiers
Transport profile (protocol) identifiers (AS2, AS4)

Out of scope: domain specific code lists (like “invoice types” etc.). But TICC could offer to handle the publication of PoACC/PrACC codelists in line with the TICC codelists.

PH to create a mandate to form a “TICC Code List Team” and send it to TICC CMB meeting.

Proposed members: PH, MF, OB -> send out to TICC list and ask for participation once the team is established.